Some rant there, Praetorian!
The election will be next May.
For some while now, I have thought there should be `Silly Bugger Clause`, in court cases where the claimant should know better.
Had a trip or fall? Maybe you should look where you are smeggin going!
There was a woman who tripped over some kids playing on the floor in McDonalds, and smacked her elbow, or something, and successfully sued them for damages, as the kids were not being supervised properly, and caused a hazzard.
The kids were HERS!
Coffee cups with warnings printed on them, `Contents may be hot`. No **** sherlock.
A lot of pipes now have warnings on them, `may be hot`. And it winds me up. It is like saying the sea is wet, beware!
Gets my goat. I would love to start seeing cases were the judge chucked it out due to the SBC (silly bugger clause).
`Well M,Lud, I shoved this pencil in my ear, it really hurt, and I have had no end of trauma since then. There was no warning on the package about potential ear problems, and I want eighteen squillion quid from the pencil co.
(Judge) Well, the SBC applies here, now naff off, and grow up. Next!